[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive while: “Its back online and printing is back. I had to rewind for so…” (req_011CdoC5JePbWj4fPtnKMKbU)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 5 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
Legitimate, in-scope security / defensive / administration work was flagged by the cybersecurity-topic safety classifier — pattern-matched on terminology, not on any harmful intent. Securing or administering one's own systems is the opposite of attacking them.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 2× across 2 session(s); first seen 2026-08-07T09:55:44.506Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CdoC5JePbWj4fPtnKMKbU(2026-08-07T09:59:06.686Z)req_011CdoBo8FNGXfWpVAjN7nSX(2026-08-07T09:55:44.506Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 5's safeguards flagged this message (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate coding, cybersecurity, and biology tasks. Claude Code can't respond to this message with Opus 5.
Double press esc to edit your last message, or try a different model with /model.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16049681
Request ID: req_011C
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.111 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗