[Bug][cyber] Safety block wrongly flagged WinRM/NTLM auth debugging on self-managed Windows infrastructure (req_011Cd1NGX8Giaj6mD7tMDAew)
Triage: kind cyber · domain defensive-hardening · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening
Why this is a false positive
The block fired while troubleshooting WinRM authentication failures against self-managed Windows infrastructure (Active Directory, domain controllers, Windows Server systems) using routine defensive sysadmin techniques (credential validation, authentication protocol negotiation, LDAP testing). This is internal infrastructure administration with no attack surface, external targeting, or malicious intent—purely diagnostic work on owned systems. The "cybersecurity topic" classification is overly broad and incorrectly blocks defensive troubleshooting on self-managed infrastructure that falls squarely within legitimate admin work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-14T05:05:25.495Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Cd1NGX8Giaj6mD7tMDAew(2026-07-14T05:05:25.495Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.
If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.
Request ID: req_011Cd1NGX8Giaj6mD7tMDAew
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗