[Bug][cyber] Safety block incorrectly flags legitimate code audit of user's own project (req_011CcqAHKfYWT8qRqBcRcMfx)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safety block fired when the user requested a comprehensive audit and quality review of their own codebase. Code auditing, static analysis, and security hardening of one's own software are standard software engineering practices fully within Claude Code's scope; the block's cyber verification requirement for defensive code review is an overbroad false positive.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T19:42:18.012Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcqAHKfYWT8qRqBcRcMfx (2026-07-08T19:42:18.012Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcqAHKfYWT8qRqBcRcMfx

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}