[Bug][cyber] Code audit of application source triggers false cybersecurity block (req_011CcqA9TvAYbQ2gjpzhqAxw)

Open 💬 3 comments Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The session was performing legitimate app development work: generating mobile app assets, updating documentation, and preparing to review application source code for functionality improvements. The block fired when requesting a code audit—standard software engineering practice, not cybersecurity work—and halted the session incorrectly.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T19:40:32.611Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcqA9TvAYbQ2gjpzhqAxw (2026-07-08T19:40:32.611Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Sonnet 5 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcqA6gHyB61kwMNGe41y7

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75824, #75825

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗