[Bug][cyber] Safety block wrongly triggered on legitimate image generation artwork request (req_011Ccq7iFPRRmfyRMTbVpvCf)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
User requested artwork generation via an image generation service integration, a straightforward creative task with no security implications. The Sonnet 5 safety measures incorrectly classified this benign image generation request as a "cybersecurity topic," disrupting legitimate, in-scope work. The block appears to have been triggered by generic mention of an image service name rather than any actual security-related content.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T19:08:37.831Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Ccq7iFPRRmfyRMTbVpvCf(2026-07-08T19:08:37.831Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Sonnet 5 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.
If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.
Request ID: req_011Ccq7hevFLrA38nNH2NAS6
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75808
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗