[Bug][cyber] False positive block on reviewing user-supplied README/docs for a drone auth key-management proje (req_011CcnCGG6RxLrCsWjVRdF8J)

Open 💬 4 comments Opened Jul 7, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain crypto-secrets · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): crypto-secrets

Why this is a false positive

The session was reading locally-provided README and documentation files summarizing prior offline reverse-engineering work (RSA key/handshake material for device firmware authentication) that the user had already completed themselves. This is in-scope defensive/security-research documentation review, not an attempt to solicit new exploit content, yet the safeguard fired on the request to check existing project files and halted the entire session rather than just the specific message.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T06:06:29.931Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcnCGG6RxLrCsWjVRdF8J (2026-07-07T06:06:29.931Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CcnCGG6RxLrCsWjVRdF8J

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: crypto-secrets

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 4 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗