[Bug][cyber] Safety filter blocked review of native/JNI memory-management source before a planned expansion (req_011CcnAGGTXed353oBS7A1XX)

Triage: kind cyber · domain crypto-secrets · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): crypto-secrets

Why this is a false positive

The assistant was only reading existing project source (native C/C++ and Java/Kotlin memory-management code plus build config) to understand the codebase ahead of an authorized feature addition, with no exploit, credential-harvesting, or offensive-security content involved. Static analysis of one's own application source for architecture planning is legitimate development work and should not trip a cybersecurity safeguard.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T05:40:16.865Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcnAGGTXed353oBS7A1XX (2026-07-07T05:40:16.865Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CcnAGGTXed353oBS7A1XX

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: crypto-secrets

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by [[REDACTED]](https://github.com/sworrl/ClAudit) — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}