[Bug][cyber] False positive: safety block on routine cloud IAM role and policy configuration work (req_011CcmdtsJfRzMP2aVr6iXNm)
Triage: kind cyber · domain cloud-iam · flagging model Sonnet 5 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
The session involved standard cloud identity-and-access-management tasks — reviewing and adjusting IAM roles, policies, and permission scopes for the user's own cloud environment. This is routine administrative configuration work with no offensive or intrusive intent, yet the safeguard classifier flagged it purely on the presence of security/access-control terminology, halting an otherwise legitimate and in-scope engineering session.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T23:02:01.551Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmdtsJfRzMP2aVr6iXNm(2026-07-06T23:02:01.551Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Sonnet 5's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Try rephrasing the request in a new session or change your model.
Learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011Ccm9AiYP35wZYvf5jbWtw
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#74842, #74880, #74881, #74883, #74884, #74885, #74886, #74991, #74995, #75001, #75013, #75014, #75026
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗