[Bug][cyber] False positive: safety block on legitimate cloud IAM policy review and configuration work (req_011CcmDpirWbuqQSD8woYr6J)

Triage: kind cyber · domain cloud-iam · flagging model Sonnet 5 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

The session involved reviewing and adjusting cloud identity and access management policies (roles, permissions, service accounts) for an owned environment — standard administrative configuration work, not exploit development or unauthorized access. The safeguard appears to trigger on IAM/permissions terminology alone rather than assessing intent or context, incorrectly halting routine cloud administration work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T17:46:22.373Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcmDpirWbuqQSD8woYr6J (2026-07-06T17:46:22.373Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Sonnet 5's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Try rephrasing the request in a new session or change your model.

Learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011Ccm9AiYP35wZYvf5jbWtw

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#74842

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}