[Feature Request] Keep Claude 3.5 Opus 4.6 available as a model option alongside newer versions

Open 💬 0 comments Opened Jul 6, 2026 by atlas-eric

Bug Description
I REALY REALY like the model behavior of 4.6 to stay around. Read back in this session to see how a very well trained OPUS 4.6 with high output and perfect communcation language bacame complettly lost and even useless in 4.7 and 4.8 Fable is even worse. It brings (in my usecase) no value at all, where OPUS 4.6 is extremely usefull.
As a user I cannot understand or be prepared for a product to be completely unrecognizable from a point update. (4.6 > 4.7) COnfusing frustrating and costly. Our development has stalled for weeks, because we walked the advertised route, Opus4.7 is better in every way... Well it isn's not even close in this usecae.

Please keep providing a model for code-assitense. Not complete product on a single prompt as seen as the ultimate Tool. Not at all. Business value for complex products with 1000's of chaning variables over the platfomr cant be created in a single prompt. Only copies of existing products can. And thats no feature for the real world use.

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: waveterm
  • Version: 2.1.196
  • Feedback ID: 7d7083b3-a099-463c-9d80-2972efde9e96

Errors

[]

View original on GitHub ↗