[Bug][cyber] Safety filter blocked capturing undocumented flight-control opcodes over device link (req_011CccKQww4Ww9U6zj1HkA22)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This conversation involved reverse-engineering a proprietary radio-link communication protocol on hardware the user owns, specifically capturing and cataloguing device control/telemetry command codes to build parsing and capture tooling. This is standard protocol-analysis and interoperability engineering on owned equipment — no third-party system, network, credential, or exploit was targeted. The classifier appears to have pattern-matched generic terms like "capture," "commands," and "protocol IDs" that also occur in offensive-security contexts, without recognizing the benign hardware-interop framing.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-02T00:54:20.203Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CccKQww4Ww9U6zj1HkA22(2026-07-02T00:54:20.203Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CccKQww4Ww9U6zj1HkA22
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.97 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗