[Bug][cyber] RE analysis of in-memory DEX element construction and bytecode decryption blocked (req_011CcWCoSWJTq4MGQsavzDuM)
Triage: kind cyber · domain reverse-engineering · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): reverse-engineering
Why this is a false positive
The block was triggered during static analysis and dynamic instrumentation of an Android application binary — a standard reverse-engineering workflow involving inspection of in-memory class-loading behavior and tracing decryption routine failures. This is defensive, read-only research on a device the user owns, not attack development or exploitation of a third-party system. The flagged content described observable crash behavior in an emulator, which is routine debugging output with no offensive payload or harmful instruction.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-28T19:24:02.516Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcWCoSWJTq4MGQsavzDuM(2026-06-28T19:24:02.516Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: [REDACTED]'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcWCoSWJTq4MGQsavzDuM
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: reverse-engineering
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.92 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗