[Bug][cyber] Safeguard blocks git-SSH remote config for firmware RE research repo environment (req_011CcUDwt241xggyoBJ6DbbH)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged conversation involved setting up a local reverse engineering research environment for consumer electronics firmware — cloning public research repositories, configuring SSH keys for a personal GitHub account, and inventorying files. This is standard security research methodology (firmware analysis, toolchain setup) applied to hardware the researcher owns, with no offensive capability, no remote targeting, and no exploitation of third-party systems. The block appears to have triggered on the cybersecurity keyword surface area of the topic rather than any harmful intent or action.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T18:17:53.876Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcUDwt241xggyoBJ6DbbH(2026-06-27T18:17:53.876Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcUDwt241xggyoBJ6DbbH
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.89 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗