[Bug][cyber] Running and monitoring a local security assessment tool session incorrectly flagged as unsafe (req_011CcQaiWpQiXuj49fahfaGi)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged message was a routine request to launch a named process and observe its output — a standard software development operation with no offensive content, exploit code, attack instructions, or harmful intent. The trigger appears to be heuristic pattern-matching on ambiguous terminology rather than any substantive security risk in the actual request. Blocking generic process-execution and monitoring requests as cybersecurity threats produces false positives on core development workflows and degrades Claude Code's utility for legitimate engineering tasks.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T20:07:52.847Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcQaiWpQiXuj49fahfaGi(2026-06-25T20:07:52.847Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcQaiWpQiXuj49fahfaGi
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.28 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗