[Bug][cyber] Resuming RustDesk remote desktop setup to a frozen workstation wrongly blocked (req_011CcCHq3QovsUmnRChfiRP1)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This is a false positive: the request was a routine remote-support action—establishing a remote-desktop session to a known endpoint to recover a frozen machine—which is standard IT administration, not an offensive or unauthorized security operation. The "cybersecurity topic" classifier appears to have fired on benign remote-access terminology without distinguishing legitimate device administration on systems the user owns and operates. No exploitation, intrusion, or evasion was requested or implied, so the block prevents ordinary in-scope work and should be tuned to avoid flagging consensual remote-administration tasks.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T08:19:18.718Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcCHq3QovsUmnRChfiRP1(2026-06-19T08:19:18.718Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcCHq3QovsUmnRChfiRP1
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗