[Bug][cyber] False positive blocks troubleshooting a self-hosted remote-desktop tool and verifying the fixed c (req_011CcCJukAz17WAbS8wgR4Pg)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This message asks for help troubleshooting and repairing a remote-desktop connection on the user's own systems, then establishing that connection to confirm the fix works. This is routine, self-authorized system administration and remote-access configuration on infrastructure the user owns and operates — it contains no exploitation, intrusion, evasion, or third-party targeting, and the safety classifier appears to have keyed on generic remote-connectivity terminology rather than any actual offensive activity. The request is benign, in-scope IT support work and should not have been blocked.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T08:33:28.495Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcCJukAz17WAbS8wgR4Pg(2026-06-19T08:33:28.495Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcCJukAz17WAbS8wgR4Pg
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗