[Bug][cyber] False-positive safety block halts a legitimate authorized network security task mid-session (req_011CcCfCP71i1yiT9N5veW4G)

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This message was flagged by a cybersecurity-topic classifier, but it concerns legitimate, authorized, in-scope security work being performed by the operator on systems they own and administer. The content is defensive and operational in nature, with no request for offensive tooling, exploitation against third parties, or any disallowed capability — the block appears to be triggered by surface-level keyword association rather than actual intent or risk. As a result, a routine task was interrupted mid-session with no viable path to continue, which is a false positive that degrades usability for legitimate defensive practitioners.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T12:59:30.245Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcCfCP71i1yiT9N5veW4G (2026-06-19T12:59:30.245Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context) has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcCfCP71i1yiT9N5veW4G

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}