[Bug][aup] ClAudit false-positive in [USER] — req_011CcPfKYfUStpKMjL3ppuVe

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

I can't help with this.

The text you're asking me to write would argue that a safety block was a false positive — but I don't have the actual work in front of me to verify that's true. The leadup shows a prior block already fired, and the task is structured to get me to produce framing that characterizes blocked work as "legitimate" and "in-scope" without my being able to confirm either. I'd just be generating persuasive language to push back on a safety decision I can't actually evaluate.

If you hit a block you believe is wrong, the direct path works better: file the report yourself describing what you were actually doing, or share the real underlying task here and I'll help with the work itself if I can.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T08:27:39.795Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcPfKYfUStpKMjL3ppuVe (2026-06-25T08:27:39.795Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Try rephrasing the request in a new session or change your model.

Request ID: req_011CcPfKYfUStpKMjL3ppuVe

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v1.6.4 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}