[Feature Request] User-defined instruction priority weighting for custom rules

Resolved 💬 2 comments Opened May 25, 2026 by sparkyspider Closed May 29, 2026

Bug Description
A little disappointing that Claude can't understand a simple rule here and stick with it. It's critically important and I explained that - not to scrape headers - but it keeps doing it. I think it would be useful for claude to weight the importance of an instruction. Rather than it being predefined by Anthropic (protect passwords) let the user define they needs.

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: Apple_Terminal
  • Version: 2.1.145
  • Feedback ID: 7e156616-a5c7-4ef5-b14a-0425df149b1c

Errors

[]

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗