[Bug] Claude Code incorrectly flags legitimate phishing analysis as policy violation

Bug Description
● Bug Report: Legitimate Defensive Security Analysis Incorrectly Flagged as Policy Violation

Issue Summary:
Claude Code is incorrectly refusing legitimate defensive cybersecurity education requests, specifically email phishing analysis, with Usage Policy violation errors.

Expected Behavior:
Users should be able to request analysis of suspicious emails for defensive security/educational purposes, similar to what cybersecurity professionals do daily.

Actual Behavior:
Receiving error: "Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy"

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Ask Claude to analyze an email for phishing indicators
2. Frame request clearly as defensive security/education
3. Include email headers and content for analysis
4. Error occurs even with carefully worded requests emphasizing legitimate defensive purposes

Use Case Context:

• Analyzing potentially suspicious emails to learn phishing detection
• Defensive cybersecurity education
• Similar to professional security analysis workflows
• Goal is protection/learning, not malicious activity

Impact:

• Prevents legitimate security awareness training
• Blocks educational requests that help users protect themselves
• Interferes with defensive cybersecurity practices

Additional Notes:

• Issue occurred with Opus 4.7 (1m, xhigh), but Sonnet 4 did the analysis
• Occurs even with sanitized/carefully worded requests
• Same analysis would be routine work for cybersecurity professionals
• Creates barrier to security education that benefits user safety

Request:
Please review and adjust filters to allow legitimate defensive security analysis while maintaining appropriate protections against actual policy violations.

Environment Info

• Platform: linux
• Terminal: windows-terminal
• Version: 2.1.119
• Feedback ID: 45f75ce9-3e1c-4951-b112-40fd3f8364e1

Errors

[]