[BUG] /usage — text overlaps progress bars in status dialog (not width-related)
Preflight Checklist
- [x] I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet
- [x] This is a single bug report (please file separate reports for different bugs)
- [x] I am using the latest version of Claude Code
What's Wrong?
When running /usage, the text labels (session / week / Opus weekly quotas) visually overlap the progress bar graphics in the status dialog. Characters are
drawn on top of the bar glyphs, making both hard to read.
Not a duplicate of #12201 (inverted fill) — this is a pure layout/overlap rendering issue.
Environment
- Claude Code version: 2.1.116
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (Linux 5.15.0-176-generic)
- Shell: bash
Additional notes
Not a terminal-width issue — reproduced at both 80 columns and on a wide terminal (large screen). The overlap persists regardless of terminal size, which
suggests the layout logic itself is incorrect rather than a truncation/wrap issue.
What Should Happen?
Expected
Progress bars and their text labels are displayed on separate visual regions, no overlap.
Actual
Text characters are rendered over the bar glyphs (or vice-versa), producing a mangled line.
Error Messages/Logs
Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce
- Launch claude in a terminal
- Run /usage
- Observe the rendered status dialog
Claude Model
None
Is this a regression?
Yes, this worked in a previous version
Last Working Version
_No response_
Claude Code Version
2.1.116
Platform
Anthropic API
Operating System
Ubuntu/Debian Linux
Terminal/Shell
Other
Additional Information
Environment
- Claude Code version: 2.1.116
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (Linux 5.15.0-176-generic)
- Shell: bash
Additional notes
Not a terminal-width issue — reproduced at both 80 columns and on a wide terminal (large screen). The overlap persists regardless of terminal size, which
suggests the layout logic itself is incorrect rather than a truncation/wrap issue.
<img width="1410" height="829" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a88f2165-cf05-4320-939c-6c461099a5df" />
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗