we need 100x plan
Status Closed — not planned
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 14 comments · opened Apr 20, 2026 · closed Jun 2, 2026
we need claude 100x plan like ultra 100x i can pay for this $600 around and i bet other developers can pay for this. guys that would be great if you guys can do that
Showing cached comments. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗
13 Comments
I'm curious why you need that and how did you managed to spend all tokens?
Using 5x plan I'm barely fit between time blocks (usually my tokens ends 15-20 minutes before next time slot).
If I run multiple concurrent agents in my tasks I need 20x then, but never was able to hit 20x limit even with doing a lot of work at the same time on multiple projects...
Hello @morsik !
so my workflow is a bit different from typical usage, I'm building an autonomous agent orchestration system where one command spawns 8-11 parallel agents, each working with full context windows. they read entire codebases, write outputs to disk, then I have verification agents that audit and refine those outputs in loops until they pass quality checks
think of it like this, instead of one conversation back and forth, running a mini engineering team inside cc. one cycle can cascade through 10-20+ agents, each burning through full context. so on the 20x plan, what should be a 5-hour window barely lasts me 45 minutes to an hour (if intensive).
ur 5x and 20x usage makes total sense for single-threaded work or even a few concurrent agents. but when you scale to full orchestration with parallel processing + audit loops + refinement cycles, the token consumption is on a completely different level. that's why i am asking for 100x, some of us are pushing cc beyond single-developer workflows into something closer to an AI operations layer
@Davronov-Alimardon I would see my self using this because as how you explained on how over 10+ agnets would neeed 100x plan
Interesting, I'm using a lot of parallel agents and never hit limits in Max 20. And I've run even 30 agents in parallel on some occasions.
But I guess, Anthropic just wants you to go into API, as subscriptions is too cheap already anyway and this would disrupt infrastructure a lot...
@morsik have u ever batched 30/40 agents in a single request? not 30 separate agents across a session. 30 firing at once from one command, each with full context. and then doing that 5-10+ times in one 5h window? that's where limits hit fast
fair point on API though, you're right. but API pricing adds up quick, i'm burning through $40-50 in the first hour alone at that rate. a fixed 100x tier even at a higher price than i originally suggested would still be more predictable. but yeah, we'll see what Anthropic decides (probably ignore 😄)
@DevFlex-AI appreciate it, seems like there's real demand for this tier beyond just my workflow ))
+1
Especially with how much Opus 4.7 eats tokens
@atlamors Have you faced the issue where Claude code glitches and just loads and then says I hit my limit before I went to the max plan
we definitely need 100x plan
Closing for now — inactive for too long. Please open a new issue if this is still relevant.
And now with dynamic workflows it would be useful... :D
I'm eating my whole weekly limit in 2-3 days of Max20 plan with this new feature... and it actually works great!
Yepp a 100x plan (or 200x if fast mode is included) is needed given how workflows have advanced. 20x is just too restrictive nowadays, gone in less than a day and that's with constant context and model management. Would love to just pay more and be able to use the best model and not care about micro-managing the plan, and rather put all focus into building 🙏 🙏 🙏
I'm thinking about just creating secondary account and buying second subscription... Apparently it's not against ToS, but... it's still kinda grey area :/