[Bug] Anthropic API Error: Extra usage required for 1M context access
Resolved 💬 2 comments Opened Apr 19, 2026 by jonapich Closed Apr 19, 2026
Bug Description
Claude code complains that "Extra usage is required for 1M context"... FWIW i've been using the 1M context for a few days and it didn't complain until now. My extra usage is indeed turned off and it was working, so it feels like a glitch to me? I tried restarting and clearing and login. Limits are all under 25%, except Claude Design at 88%. On Max 20x.
Is the message just misleading and it means the servers are under stress? (it's written rate-limited and not "denied"). Maybe the error message should be clearer / more transparent?
Environment Info
- Platform: win32
- Terminal: windows-terminal
- Version: 2.1.113
- Feedback ID: fcae5fc1-9e51-4bc9-bef3-e882f2adeabb
Errors
[{"error":"Error: 429 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"rate_limit_error\",\"message\":\"Extra usage is required for long context requests.\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CaDN5ruUzzZ7auxMPerEW\"}\n at generate (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:53135)\n at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T15:26:44.538Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"rate_limit_error\",\"message\":\"Extra usage is required for long context requests.\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CaDN7rPnXzF99paJsvY3g\"}\n at generate (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:53135)\n at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T15:27:11.707Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"rate_limit_error\",\"message\":\"Extra usage is required for long context requests.\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CaDNA7mJoRpz8JnXaUCfe\"}\n at generate (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:53135)\n at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T15:27:42.215Z"}]This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗