[Bug] Anthropic API Error: Extra usage required for 1M context access
Status Fixed / completed
Reported on v2.1.113
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 2 comments · opened Apr 19, 2026 · closed Apr 19, 2026
Bug Description
Claude code complains that "Extra usage is required for 1M context"... FWIW i've been using the 1M context for a few days and it didn't complain until now. My extra usage is indeed turned off and it was working, so it feels like a glitch to me? I tried restarting and clearing and login. Limits are all under 25%, except Claude Design at 88%. On Max 20x.
Is the message just misleading and it means the servers are under stress? (it's written rate-limited and not "denied"). Maybe the error message should be clearer / more transparent?
Environment Info
- Platform: win32
- Terminal: windows-terminal
- Version: 2.1.113
- Feedback ID: fcae5fc1-9e51-4bc9-bef3-e882f2adeabb
Errors
[{"error":"Error: 429 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"rate_limit_error\",\"message\":\"Extra usage is required for long context requests.\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CaDN5ruUzzZ7auxMPerEW\"}\n at generate (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:53135)\n at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T15:26:44.538Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"rate_limit_error\",\"message\":\"Extra usage is required for long context requests.\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CaDN7rPnXzF99paJsvY3g\"}\n at generate (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:53135)\n at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T15:27:11.707Z"},{"error":"Error: 429 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"rate_limit_error\",\"message\":\"Extra usage is required for long context requests.\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CaDNA7mJoRpz8JnXaUCfe\"}\n at generate (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:11:53135)\n at makeRequest (B:/~BUN/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:50:4943)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-04-19T15:27:42.215Z"}]This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗