Opus model quality regression — slower problem solving, repetitive confirmation loops
Resolved 💬 3 comments Opened Apr 9, 2026 by mylcn59 Closed Apr 13, 2026
Problem
Over the past few weeks, I've noticed a significant regression in Claude Code's (Opus) ability to understand and solve problems efficiently. Tasks that previously took 30 minutes now take much longer due to:
- Repetitive confirmation requests — After I give explicit approval ("do whatever is needed"), the model still asks for confirmation again
- Analysis paralysis — Instead of directly solving a problem, it enters unnecessary verification loops
- Not listening — I have to repeat the same instruction multiple times before the model acts on it
- Slower problem comprehension — The model used to understand my intent quickly and act; now it over-analyzes and under-delivers
Example (today)
- Simple task: clean dead code + fix a bug + optimize a fetch call
- Model identified the issues correctly but then got stuck in confirmation loops when a pre-commit hook blocked an edit
- I said "do whatever is needed" → model still asked "should I use sed via bash?"
- Previously this would have been resolved immediately
Environment
- Model: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)
- Project: Production e-commerce Next.js app
- Usage: Daily, heavy usage for months
Expected behavior
The model should maintain its previous level of problem-solving speed and responsiveness to user instructions. When a user gives broad approval, the model should act without re-asking.
Impact
This is affecting my daily productivity significantly. I rely on Claude Code as my primary development tool.
This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗