Opus model quality regression — slower problem solving, repetitive confirmation loops

Resolved 💬 3 comments Opened Apr 9, 2026 by mylcn59 Closed Apr 13, 2026

Problem

Over the past few weeks, I've noticed a significant regression in Claude Code's (Opus) ability to understand and solve problems efficiently. Tasks that previously took 30 minutes now take much longer due to:

  1. Repetitive confirmation requests — After I give explicit approval ("do whatever is needed"), the model still asks for confirmation again
  2. Analysis paralysis — Instead of directly solving a problem, it enters unnecessary verification loops
  3. Not listening — I have to repeat the same instruction multiple times before the model acts on it
  4. Slower problem comprehension — The model used to understand my intent quickly and act; now it over-analyzes and under-delivers

Example (today)

  • Simple task: clean dead code + fix a bug + optimize a fetch call
  • Model identified the issues correctly but then got stuck in confirmation loops when a pre-commit hook blocked an edit
  • I said "do whatever is needed" → model still asked "should I use sed via bash?"
  • Previously this would have been resolved immediately

Environment

  • Model: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)
  • Project: Production e-commerce Next.js app
  • Usage: Daily, heavy usage for months

Expected behavior

The model should maintain its previous level of problem-solving speed and responsiveness to user instructions. When a user gives broad approval, the model should act without re-asking.

Impact

This is affecting my daily productivity significantly. I rely on Claude Code as my primary development tool.

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗