[Bug] Memory not automatically updated after code changes in conversation
Status Closed — not planned
Reported on v2.1.86
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 4 comments · opened Mar 28, 2026 · closed Apr 29, 2026
Bug Description
My current conversation with Opus 4.6 on max settings was productive and as expected but the changes we (opus 4.6 and I) implemented were not propagated to the memory by default. Only after I explicitly asked, was memory updated which is the issue becasue subsequent conversations would have used outdated values stored in memory.
Environment Info
- Platform: darwin
- Terminal: windsurf
- Version: 2.1.86
- Feedback ID: 543afe70-e9c3-4c4e-a668-d64104a21498
Errors
[{"error":"Error: NON-FATAL: Lock acquisition failed for /Users/tony/.local/share/claude/versions/2.1.86 (expected in multi-process scenarios)\n at _p_ (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2851:2138)\n at Vn6 (/$bunfs/root/src/entrypoints/cli.js:2851:1218)\n at processTicksAndRejections (native:7:39)","timestamp":"2026-03-28T20:26:48.711Z"}]This issue has 4 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗