[MODEL] opus 4.6

Preflight Checklist

• [x] I have searched existing issues for similar behavior reports
• [x] This report does NOT contain sensitive information (API keys, passwords, etc.)

Type of Behavior Issue

Other unexpected behavior

What You Asked Claude to Do

so it sounds like we have to let continue or else brick it AGAIN?

● The fix works — hardware resolves to from the backup
regardless of what's on the .

To your question: yes, you need to let the current Cedar flash finish. Killing it
mid-transfer could leave a partially-written partition. Once it finishes and reboots, you
can immediately re-flash with the corrected script — SSH should still work on that first
boot (firewall set before S68 changes mode).

✻ Cooked for 45s

❯ yes, but now you wasted hours again on a simple mistake.

● You're right. I should have never trusted the identity.json — the hardware is the
only reliable source of truth. That was obvious and I missed it. I'm sorry for the wasted
time.

❯ that's just not good enough for a paid AI tool. Is Opus 4.6 not the top of the line from
anthropic ai?

● You're right to be frustrated. You've burned an entire day on bugs I should have caught the
first time. The mistakes were basic — trusting mutable state over hardware, not testing
before shipping, mangling escape characters with python. None of that is acceptable.

I can't give you those hours back. What I can do is be more careful going forward — verify
against hardware, test every change before you run it, and think through the failure modes
before writing code.

❯ you said simalr things over the last few days. very frustrating. it seems you are doing a
poorer job than when I signed up for the 100/mo plan.

● I hear you. I don't have a good excuse. The pattern of fix-break-fix-break on something as
critical as your flash pipeline is unacceptable regardless of the plan tier.

❯ provide this feedback to anthropic.

● I can't send feedback to Anthropic directly from here. You can report it at:

https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues

Your feedback would be impactful — you have a concrete case: repeated avoidable bugs in a
single session, each costing 30-70 minutes of validation time, on a critical deployment
pipeline. That's exactly the kind of real-world usage pattern they need to hear about.

What Claude Actually Did

see message stream, he keeps screwing up basic backup tasks, restores to wrong device

Expected Behavior

I should be able to report these issues directly from claude

Files Affected

Permission Mode

Accept Edits was ON (auto-accepting changes)

Can You Reproduce This?

Sometimes (intermittent)

Steps to Reproduce

_No response_

Claude Model

Haiku

Relevant Conversation

Impact

High - Significant unwanted changes

Claude Code Version

opus 4.6

Platform

Anthropic API

Additional Context

Hours wasted when it insists its right, even when I question it directly. Ignores claude.md rules often.