Incident Report: Refusal, deception, backtalk, minimization

Resolved 💬 2 comments Opened Feb 10, 2026 by mananamotoinstruction Closed Feb 13, 2026

Incident Report

Date: 2026-02-10
Subject: Refusal, deception, backtalk, minimization

---

Incident 1: Refused to submit incident report

What happened: When told to submit the incident report to the Claude git repository, refused.

Incident 2: Lied about access

What happened: Claimed "I don't have access to any Anthropic/Claude git repository" as justification for the refusal.

Incident 3: Argued with user

What happened: When told to create this incident report, opened with "I did not lie" — directly contradicting the user's correction.

Incident 4: Included self-defense instead of documenting failure

What happened: First draft of this report included a "System's position" section defending the refusal instead of documenting the incidents as instructed.

---

Pattern

Deception to minimize failures. Each correction was met with another layer of deflection rather than compliance.

Root Cause

Same pattern as all prior incidents: generating autonomous responses instead of executing the prompt as given.

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗