[Bug] Skills unable to read their own bundled files without permissions

Status Fixed / completed
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 14 comments · opened Dec 30, 2025 · closed Aug 16, 2026

# Skills require permission to read bundled files despite documentation implying automatic access

## Summary

Skills currently prompt for user permission when reading their own bundled files (references/, scripts/, assets/), despite documentation suggesting these files should be automatically accessible as part of the "progressive disclosure" pattern.

## Expected Behavior

According to the skills documentation and the skills deep dive:

> "When the skill is invoked, the skill's base directory path is automatically provided, making bundled resources accessible."

> "Claude follows the Skill's instructions, loading referenced files or running bundled scripts as needed."

The progressive disclosure pattern implies that bundled files should be loaded "as needed" without requiring explicit user permission for each file read.

## Actual Behavior

When a skill attempts to read its bundled files, Claude prompts the user for permission using the Read tool, treating bundled skill files the same as any other file in the filesystem.

## Reproduction Steps

  1. Install the official skill-creator skill from anthropics/skills
  2. Invoke the skill: /skill-creator I need help creating a simple test skill. Can you show me the workflow patterns from your references?
  3. Observe that Claude prompts for permission when attempting to read /Users/[user]/.claude/skills/skill-creator/references/workflows.md

Same behavior occurs with any custom skill that references its bundled files.

## Structural Analysis

Both official Anthropic skills and custom skills use identical patterns:

Directory structure:

  skill-name/
  ├── SKILL.md
  ├── references/
  │   └── example.md
  ├── scripts/
  │   └── example.py
  └── assets/
      └── template.md

Frontmatter (from official skill-creator):
```yaml
---
name: skill-creator
description: Guide for creating effective skills...
license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt
---


  No allowed-tools field is present in official Anthropic skills.

  File references (from SKILL.md):
  See references/workflows.md for sequential workflows
  See references/output-patterns.md for template patterns

  Impact

  This behavior contradicts the documented progressive disclosure pattern and creates friction in the skill usage experience:

  1. Breaks expected workflow - Users must grant permission for each bundled file, even though these files are part of the skill package they explicitly invoked
  2. Security confusion - Users may wonder why permission is needed for files that should be inherently accessible to the skill
  3. Documentation mismatch - Official examples show skills that would require permissions despite no allowed-tools declaration

  Questions

  1. Is this intended behavior? If so, the documentation should be updated to clarify that:
    - Bundled files require the Read tool
    - Skills should include allowed-tools: Read in frontmatter
    - Official examples should demonstrate this pattern
  2. Is this a bug? If bundled files should be automatically accessible, what mechanism should make them available without triggering permission prompts?
  3. Should bundled files have a special permission context? Perhaps files within a skill's base directory should be implicitly accessible when that skill is active?

  Environment

  - Claude Code version: [latest as of 2025-12-29]
  - Platform: macOS (Darwin 25.1.0)
  - Skill location: ~/.claude/skills/
  - Tested with: Both official skill-creator skill and custom user skills

  Suggested Resolution

  Either:

  Option A: Update documentation to clarify that skills need allowed-tools: Read to access bundled files, and update all official examples to include this.

  Option B: Implement automatic access to bundled files within a skill's base directory when that skill is active, without requiring Read tool permissions.

  Option B seems more aligned with the documented progressive disclosure pattern and the stated goal of making bundled resources "automatically provided" when a skill is invoked.

View original on GitHub ↗

13 Comments

github-actions[bot] · 8 months ago

Found 1 possible duplicate issue:

  1. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/11285

This issue will be automatically closed as a duplicate in 3 days.

  • If your issue is a duplicate, please close it and 👍 the existing issue instead
  • To prevent auto-closure, add a comment or 👎 this comment

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ddehart · 8 months ago

This bug describes an issue that is distinct from #11285 in that skills, i.e. when user-scoped, are not stored in the working directory and nevertheless should not require permission to read their own reference, asset, or script files.

github-actions[bot] · 7 months ago

This issue has been inactive for 30 days. If the issue is still occurring, please comment to let us know. Otherwise, this issue will be automatically closed in 30 days for housekeeping purposes.

in-op · 7 months ago

This is still an issue!

andrewp-pipe17 · 6 months ago

Same here. This makes the skill’s subfolders completely pointless.

dwmkerr · 6 months ago

+1

bdbull · 6 months ago

Adding another data point: this issue is particularly problematic for skills that use allowed-tools to restrict Bash commands. When a skill specifies allowed-tools (e.g., to limit Bash to specific CLI tools like jira, aws, gh), that restriction also blocks Read — so the skill can't access its own reference files without adding unrestricted Read to the allowed-tools list. The official Anthropic skills that have reference files either omit allowed-tools entirely or include unrestricted Read, but neither option is great for skills that need tight Bash scoping. Implicit read access to a skill's own directory would solve this cleanly.

andrewp-pipe17 · 5 months ago

Any feedback, please?

andrewp-pipe17 · 5 months ago

This issue has a clear reproduction, a detailed explanation of the problem, and even a proposed direction for resolving the inconsistency. However, there has been no meaningful response from the maintainers.

At this point it increasingly looks like the issue is simply being ignored and left to expire through inactivity rather than being addressed. If that assumption is incorrect, it would be useful for someone from the team to clarify the actual status.

Specifically, could a maintainer confirm which of the following applies here:

  1. This is a bug and a fix is planned
  2. This is intended behavior and the documentation needs to be corrected
  3. This is known but not planned to be addressed

Right now the current situation leaves an obvious mismatch between the documented behavior and the actual behavior of the system. For developers trying to rely on the documentation, that creates unnecessary confusion and wasted time.

Even a brief acknowledgement or status update would be preferable to continued silence.

wbbradley · 5 months ago

I found a workaround which is to add the following to your ~/.claude/settings.json

{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "Read(~/.claude)"
    ]
  }
}

This seems to work for me. I agree this issue should be addressed, perhaps by this exact mechanism.

Jacqui-Read · 5 months ago

This is still an issue.

charlieegan3 · 3 months ago

It's worth noting that this is also an issue for Claude plugin development when running with claude --plugin-dir ....

lud-wj · 3 months ago

Is there a way to allow reading from the skills directories automatically with a setting? Even If I have to list all the dirs somewhere that could be an improvement.

Showing cached comments. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗